🔗 Share this article

At first, Donald Trump seemed to adopt a firm stance regarding Ukraine. After issuing threats of "severe consequences" last August in case Russia's president carried on obstructing ceasefire discussions, he ultimately enacted considerable restrictions on the Russian primary petroleum corporations, Rosneft and Lukoil. This decision seriously affected the Russian leader's capability to fund his war effort in the region.

But, via his newly presented detailed peace plan for the conflict, that was drafted by both nations' diplomats excluding Ukraine's or EU input, the former president has apparently returned to his Russia-friendly approach.

Favoring Aggression

This initiative would essentially benefit Putin for occupying Ukraine while leaving the country's political freedom in danger. Although strong statements that "Ukraine's independence will be confirmed", much of the initiative actually weaken that essential autonomy. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would certainly be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his business experience, the former president persists to consider the war as a simple territorial dispute, as if ceding Putin a portion of Ukraine's territory will satisfy the president. However, Russia's invasion is not merely about controlling a damaged area of industrial-devastated land in the Donbas region. It is about Ukraine's democratic governance – and Putin's obvious goal to weaken it so it stops acts as an enticing model for the Russia's population of the responsible government that Putin's increasing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Land Surrenders

While keeping in place the presently divided oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the plan would compel Ukraine to surrender the entire Donetsk province. Beyond favoring Russia with territory that its troops have been unsuccessful to seize in over a lengthy period of fighting, this concession would render Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously undermined.

This region is the site of the nation's well-known "fortress belt", the entrenched military defenses that represent a critical impediment to enemy progress. The proposal would have Ukraine surrender these fortifications, giving Putin a unobstructed route to Kyiv should he eventually opt to restart the hostilities.

Defense Reductions

Then, in a move that would make renewed hostilities more feasible for the Russian military, the plan would force the nation to cut the numbers of its troops from their existing large number troops to a cap of six hundred thousand. Importantly, Trump's initiative places no equivalent restrictions on Russia's military.

Seemingly as a gesture to Russia's attempts to portray Ukraine's chosen by the people government as Nazis, Trump's proposal asserts: "Any radical ideology and activities must be condemned and forbidden." Apparently to emphasize this point, it insists that "The nation will hold elections in three months" of a truce. At the same time, the proposal places no obligation that Putin jeopardize his dictatorship by conducting elections in his own country.

Protection Assurances

Admittedly, the initiative has the Russian Federation commit not to "enter other states" and to "establish in legislation its position of non-violence towards European nations and the Ukrainian people". But considering that the Russian leadership has breached comparable accords in the previous instances – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government pledged to respect the nation's borders in return for relinquishing its Soviet-era nuclear arsenal, and the Minsk accords, in which Russia committed to a halt in fighting and a handback of seized land in eastern Ukraine to Kyiv – why should anyone believe Putin on this occasion?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on western defense commitments. Although the initiative promises a "decisive joint military response" should the Russian Federation resume its aggression, and provides that "The nation will receive reliable protection assurances", the specifics include vague to concerning. The initiative would not only prevent Ukraine alliance membership but also prevent member states from deploying troops on Ukrainian territory, effectively precluding the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly led by the UK and France, on which Ukraine had been depending to prevent Russia from restoring his reduced forces, restocking, and reinvading.

International Reaction

Another parallel deal reportedly would offer Ukraine with a alliance-like security guarantee, in which any subsequent "serious, planned, and sustained military assault" by Russia on Ukraine "shall be regarded as an act of war threatening the peace and security of the Western nations." This indicates a armed reaction. But unlike a strong national defense – Ukraine's best defense against renewed Russian aggression – the success of the side agreement would rely on the dedication of Western powers, like Trump, to respond militarily to Putin's aggression, an action they have {not