🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which enable stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.